NEVER FALL FOR THIS ATTEMPT TO
DIRECT THE PURCHASER'S CLOSING TO THE BANK'S SETTLMENT AGENT.
Here's why:
1. To receive the Free
Title Insurance, the Purchaser must allow the REO Settlement Agent or Attorney
to represent both sides. This non-local law firm or settlement agency receives
all of their business from the Bank, Fannie, or Freddie. Their goal is to represent
the Purchaser so allegedly things will go smoother for their main client - the
REO Seller. If a conflict arises at closing, do you really believe they will
favor their new client (the Purchaser) over their larger regular client (the
REO Seller)? Whose interest are they really looking out for?
2. The settlement agency or
law firm which normally represents the Seller is never local. They may be from
a nearby state like Maryland, or if from Virginia, areas like Richmond or
Virginia Beach. All communications with them and the Purchaser, the Lender, and
the Realtor has to be through long distance, fax, or email. The only time they
appear locally is when they send someone (usually a notary) to perform the
signing of the closing documents. Is this a reasonable way to obtain a smooth
closing? Is this the type of service you look for? Do you really want the
Purchaser to close with a notary at a fast food restaurant?
Stay tuned for a future Tucker's
Tip that will discuss the real economic costs of the closing and the "Free
Owner's Title Insurance."
Contact me at 434-951-0858 or Tucker@TGBLaw.com if you have questions.
William D. Tucker, III
Tucker Griffin Barnes P.C.
Charlottesville, VA
434-973-7474
www.TGBlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment